Wednesday, December 30, 2009

The Movie I Made Last Semester

So, yesterday I finally was able to bring myself to watch my most recent short film, Starvation Day, again. It's always a bit of a challenge, working up the courage to revisit something you threw your entire heart and soul into (especially considering when last you judged it, you were sleep-deprived and potentially half-crazy). Experience has only worsened this sentiment. It is usually about six months between when I make something and when I never want to see it again.

And when I talk about a rewatch, I am not referring to audience screenings. I've shown my film to family members since I have been back, and although I've come to understand that any sort of familial feedback is pretty much worthless (as even Jesus really couldn't catch a break from the home audience until after he was gone), I still spend all of my audience screenings scanning the faces of my viewers for reactions. I've done that at least three or four times since I "finished" my most recent film, and every time, the audience reaction has been somewhat similar, even if my reaction to it was almost completely different each time.

No, when I refer to a rewatch, I am talking about me sitting down with my film and having it out. Scanning every frame; looking at all the unfixable errors I had become fully aware of while editing, but didn't have the strength of heart to compile; choosing to finally separate myself from the work, and only then decide whether the baby I carried for three months should be raised or bashed against the rocks (it's a very Spartan process). Nothing is scarier than objectivity, because it is only when I start pulling up all the rugs that I realize just what is beneath me. Whenever I do it, I always think about the scene in Blade Runner where Rupert Hauer's replicant finally meets his creator. That's the sentiment I bring with me whenever I go face to face with my creation. People who know how that turned out will know why I have a complex about viewing my finished work.

In regards to Starvation Day, I will say that it is simultaneously the best thing I have ever made by a long shot, and yet at the same time, audience reactions have been so mixed that I have struggled with it immensely. As a difficult genre film (as well as an epic student short with a run time of over 20 minutes), it is tough for me to accept it as the final product of so long and strenuous a process. I worked on the script for ages (although it was rewritten so many times that I cannot really credit any of its concepts or ideas to much earlier than two months before the shoot). My actors and crew will let you know just how long we worked on the film (the shoot alone totaled over ten days of intensive work). And yet, at the end, I'm even now not sure whether it is a legitimate contender for student film festival competition. It certainly doesn't fit into the mold of those sorts of films at all. I just sort of had to decide whether that rendered it worthless.

So, what was the conclusion between me and my film? Once we had dueled, where were we left? Was it thumbs up or down? Had I epically misfired? Well, kind of. I actually divulged more from a recent set of notes that I discovered after the film was done shooting. The notes were written eons ago as I started into a new version of the script (a far more self-reflective one full of voiceovers and trippy imagery). I will post some of the highlights from the notes, specifically the thematic progression that I had at one point sought to aim for (it in no way resembles the film I eventually made).

We open on a guy trapped in his room at the end of the world (zombies). He has decided to hold out there and try to survive as long as he can. He doesn’t think he can survive, but he is going to hold out as long as he can. ----------- He journals about his experience. However, as time goes on, he stops journaling, and just begins saying it all out loud. ----------- He has dreams that we see. Slowly, daily life and dream begin to inter-mix. He has dreams, and talks to and interacts with the characters from his dreams in daily life (or at least references them and thinks about them in real life). He justifies it by saying they help him cope. He tells them about his fear of death, his failed relationships, and all of the things he obsessed over before the event happened. ----------- There is eventually no longer any separation between dream and reality. Thought and the room. His mind has become one with the room. Within that room, all of his thoughts live, and we have no idea where it ceases to be thought and where it becomes reality. ------------ We flash back to his real life. We see that he lives in auto pilot. He subsists. He loves to be loved back. He goes to work to make money. He spends time with people to be entertained. He is shy, and does nothing for others. He gets by. ------------- His mind is his room. Suddenly, with all of the dead around his room, we begin to see that his surrounding is hell. He has allowed himself to be trapped in his mind. Surrounded by zombies. Surrounded by the dead and mindless. In hell. Thusly, we complete the three part puzzle. His mind has always been his cage. However, once trapped in the room, his mind is given a place to breed all of its darkest ideas in a physical sense. That physical sense is revealed for the hell that it is. It is at that point that we realize that his life of subsistence, is in fact, hell. Once the people that could love him are gone; once he is left without anything to live for, a goal or a purpose or some expectation that something is on the horizon, life loses its purpose. Those things just numbed the immediacy of that conclusion. Hence, those things never really gave it a purpose. The question to be left with is, “What would?” --------------

As anyone who has seen my film will note, it doesn't have near the grasp of the movie described here. I would even go so far as to say that the movie I describe above is a lot better than the one I made. Somewhere in the process, something got changed. Maybe I was intimidated by the subject matter. Maybe I was scared that I was unable to pull off the above film. However, as I mentioned earlier, the movie that I actually made and I have finally had it out. And we kind of like each other. At least, I kind of liked it. It seemed to like me (in a HAL 9000 sort of way). At the very least, it marked an unprecedented improvement on my part in the realm of lighting, shot selection, and storytelling. I was especially proud of the emotional roller coaster I took the audience on. I think I went for some difficult things, and audience reactions have been spot on to what I was going for. Maybe this film is so much better that I won't hate it in six months. Regardless, I look forward to keeping up with the process and constantly improving.

Lastly, here's a little clip that has never hit the web until now. It is my old parallel parking video that I did for Single Camera Productions as my first assignment. Never on the web until now, it was the first thing I shot all year. It is really just an exercise. The opening scene is missing (I forgot to press record, of all of the unprofessional things to do). I wrote it in half an hour, we shot it in one day, and I edited it in one night. But here it is in all its glory for the first time. I highly doubt Starvation Day will be hitting the web any time soon. If you are interested in seeing that, please talk to me directly. Some of my other short films are linked below. At least, the ones that I can still bear showing people.


The Freshman Fifteen


Sorry about the video not showing. There has been some technical issues with uploading it. It will be up eventually. Just not sure exactly how.

Maiden Voyage (Insert Ironic Titanic Reference Here because it's 4 AM and I'm not witty enough to think of one, so I'll resort to a time-tested cheat)

Well, it is late and I am on Christmas break, just sitting in my basement on the couch. I am listening to Cloud Cult (one of my new obsessions) and am now writing online (an old one). I have picked up this blog again in order to renew an old challenge that I once made to myself, that I would write at least one thing every single day. What that one thing was, I never would specify, although for the past five years, I have mostly written film scripts or movie reviews (or lists). For almost three years I remained resolved to the challenge of daily writing, and then, earlier in 2009, I stopped. I'm not sure what stopped me, but my general amount of writing diminished greatly.


So, here on Christmas break seemed like the perfect time to start typing again. I've had this old blog for ages, but never once actually brought myself to put an entry into it. I guess I always categorized writing into one of two places: either it was for my friends or for me, and that dictated whether it went on Facebook or onto a pad of paper next to my bed. Well, as a way of motivating my thoughts out of my head (something that becomes harder and, I will admit, less enjoyable as time passes), I decided it was high time I got an actual blog. So here it is.

A few thoughts before I shove off for the evening. I am actually, at the moment, killing time that could probably be better spent elsewhere. I have in my room DVDs of Wings of Desire and Laura, two films that have been on my radar for quite some time, that I intentionally sought to view over break. However, I made the mistake (that I often make) of renting about nine or ten movies all at once. The problem with that strategy (and it certainly isn't that it is too many movies. My ability to consume movies, even with my inability to focus on anything for more than ten minutes, is pretty much legendary. Those who know me might recall my stories of watching three movies a day almost my entire first semester of my Freshman year) is that, when you rent ten anticipated movies, the odds are that at least one of them is going to absolutely blow your mind. I am not the kind of person who just watches a movie once. When I like a film, I will watch it again almost immediately. I will then give it a day, show it to a friend, then watch it with the audio commentary, and then watch it again to see what the audio commentary added to the experience.

Like clockwork, that very thing happened to me again. As a matter of fact, it happened twice, and on the first two movies I saw. The movies were Howard Hawks' Rio Bravo and Jaques Tourneur's Out of the Past. The former film is an established classic (often cited as one of the favorite films of people as prominent as Quentin Tarantino). The second film is more of a side classic. It comes from a filmmaker whose work I had only seen a little bit of (Tourner's Cat People is a delightfully pulpy (yet savagely intelligent) sub-classic, and I've yet to see any of his other horror stuff with Lewton, although it all sits atop my Netflix queue). While Rio Bravo shook me to my core (it is one of the most BA films I have ever seen, boasting career-best performances from both John Wayne and Dean Martin), it was Out of the Past that surprised me the most.
Out of the Past simply was one of the most entertaining films I have ever seen. I have always called myself a lover of film noir. However, it took Out of the Past to convince me that I really wasn't; at least, not until I had seen this film. Once I saw Out of the Past, I realized that I had held reservations about the entire noir genre. I realized its potential, but had always felt it fell just short of meeting it. As much as I love The Maltese Falcon, Double Indemnity, and The Third Man, none of those staples of the noir canon ever really made their way into my heart. Maybe it was an out of place line delivery by Bogart. Maybe it was that the blacks weren't black enough. Maybe the witty dialog just didn't sizzle at all times like I wanted it too. Maybe the femme fatales were just a tad too predictable, or the villains seemed just a bit too dumb. Nothing ever ruined the films for me. I consider them all classics, but never felt I saw a definitive example that I could call my own (prior to this week, my favorite noir was Hitchcock's Shadow of a Doubt, which excludes almost all the elements I just mentioned). Then I saw Out of the Past. I rarely allow myself to put a movie on my favorite films list after one viewing, but so shaken was I by Out of the Past that I had to find some way to justify telling people about it immediately.

And so, I first took to rewatching it immediately after I saw it the first time. Not quite immediately, I suppose. I tried watching my first Bunuel (The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie). I made it through the film (which was funny at times, but I've never been able to get much into French class comedies, with the exception of Rules of the Game). However, the entire time I was thinking about Out of the Past. Quoting its brilliant dialog in my head. Seeing Robert Mitchum deliver lines from the archetype he was born to play (or, more accurately, the archetype that was invented so he could play it). And so, I watched it again. And I loved it even more. Outside of the entertainment value of the film (which was incredible. I ranked it as just a bit more fun than The Empire Strikes Back), the thematic depth the script carried was amazing. I almost immediately recalled a quote I once heard about Chinatown, about how it took a formula and made it a story. Out of the Past did the same thing, and reminded me why I loved movies (it was the first film I finished alone in one sitting since this last summer).

Then, the next day, I watched it again with my cousin. I have now watched the film 6 times, and felt justified in rewriting my top films list to include it. I don't know why, but I have always felt a desire to rank things. It is just the way my mind works. I enjoy the process of recalling all the films I love, and weighing in on their value. Of course, I see no value in it for others (except maybe as a means by which to judge me), but people love lists, and so I went on my favorite movies spot on Facebook (I did a blog about it just a few months ago, and I didn't want to beat a dead horse on the topic). However, seeing as how this is my first blog, I will post the list here for any stragglers to read.

1. Sherlock Jr.
2. The Passion of Joan of Arc
3. The Lord of the Rings
4. Rear Window
5. Out of the Past
6. The Empire Strikes Back
7. Lawrence of Arabia
8. No Country for Old Men
9. The General
10. Vertigo
11. Make Way for Tomorrow
12. M
13. Vampyr
14. Le Circle Rouge
15. The 400 Blows
16. Rio Bravo
17. The 39 Steps
18. Nosferatu
19. The Seventh Seal
20. His Girl Friday
21. The Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn
22. Casablanca
23. Army of Shadows
24. Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
25. Night of the Hunter
26. Ikiru
27. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
28. City Lights
29. Patton
30. Wall-E
31. Tokyo Story
32. The Hudsucker Proxy
33. Rififi
34. Shadow of a Doubt
35. Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
36. Toy Story
37. Blade Runner
38. White Heat
39. Faust
40. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence
41. Metropolis
42. Bridge on the River Kwai
43. Umberto D
44. Rules of the Game
45. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
46. Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
47. Steamboat Bill Jr.
48. 2001: A Space Odyssey
49. Its a Wonderful Life
50. The Bicycle Thief

Well, that's about it. I will try to keep the blog from being completely dominated by film talk (as I don't know a single one of my friends who enjoys ranting [and raving madly at the top of their lungs from the top of buildings] about the art of film as much as I do). I know that I can bore quite easily. So I will quit while I'm ahead (or, at least not as behind as I would be if I expounded as much as I want to). One last note, the name on the top of this blog (The Last Laugh) is so because of a movie that was supposed to be on this list. However, at the last second I realized that I had forgotten to put Blade Runner on there. The last correction made it so that the title of the blog was in no way meaningful (as The Last Laugh was my fiftieth favorite film). Therefore, I will quickly make a plug for what supposedly is my 51st favorite film of all time, The Last Laugh. It's an excellent film from one of my all time favorite filmmakers (F.W. Murnau, whose Nosferatu, Faust, and Sunrise make him one of the most represented filmmakers on the list). Anyone looking into silent film would be smart to begin with Murnau (alongside his peer, Fritz Lang, and with a good helping of Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton). But I digress.... seriously. Hope you keep reading.